Should Smoking be banned in all public places?

heater came to Britain Should in the 1600s but nevertheless started to buy the farm fashionable in the nineteen sixties and seventies. The main(prenominal) attraction to locoweed came from the idolisation of pop-stars and supermodels that heaterd, but did non know the gambles. Today we do know the risks, so wherefore do so many a(prenominal) clam up stinkpot? One reason is that many battalion who pile started when they were young teenagers, when they did non understand the risks associated. Instead, their solely aim was to go for the right look. Others whitethorn turn in been driven through the desire to appear older. Teenagers may too have started to smoke due to the turn of peer impel. Statistically, not many people lower green goddess at a later age. usually the reason behind starting to smoke as an adult is due to work related pressure or simply stress. Statistically, there is a great percentage of women smoke than men this is due to exploitation consum e as a slimming aid.Hundreds of people ease up from smoke related diseases from each one stratum. Deaths ca lend oneselfd by fastball argon six times higher than the 20,170 dyings arising from way accidents (3,444) poisoning and all overdose (2,663) other accidental deaths (8,986) rack up and manslaughter (503) suicide (4,379) and HIV infection (195) in the UK during 1998.World-wide, most 4 meg die prematurely each year as a result of fume. Smoking has to a greater uttermost than 50 ways of making spirit a misery through infirmity and more than 20 ways of killing you. In general, smokers turn tail poorer wellness than non-smokers. It has been estimated that, in England, 284,000 patients be admitted to NHS hospitals each year due to disease caused by fastball, occupying an average of 9,500 hospital beds every day. In addition, smoke related illness accounts for 8 million consultations with GPs and over 7 million prescriptions each year.The most common cause of deat h through ingest is lung mountaincer this is when tar builds up within the lungs stopping them from functioning properly. So why should non-smokers inhale this fatal smoke? It is said in one year hands-off voice smoking was raise to be linked to more than 1,000 deaths in capital of the United Kingdom from coronary heart disease. Passive smoking is the inhaling of smoke from other smokers. Roy Castle is an example of someone who died from passive smoke. He died of lung cancer through the inhaling of smoke whilst performing his trumpet in a nightclub, yet he never smoked himself.From hearing this information of passive smoking, should smoking be criminalise in reality places? The government in Singapore has already do that decision. Smoking in Singapore is exilened in all universal places smokers argon depictd to use especially built rooms with huge separator fans to stop the smoke getting out. This is quite organic nevertheless Singapore is clearly helping others handica p healthy. My personal flavoring is that smoking shouldnt be banned from all places, but I do feel there should be designated states for smokers and non-smokers. I believe that non-smokers have the right to sit in a non-smoking area to avoid inhaling smoke of others, they should not have to clothe up with the smell or health risk smoking contains.Currently, one debate focuses on smoking in the work place. Many companies are eradicating smoking in their offices and to a fault some are choosing non-smokers over qualified smoking candidates. Also companies are considering to force their smoking employees buy off for additional health insurance. I agree with this as companies should not pay the hail of someones habit, as smokers are fully aware of the cost of their habit both health wise and financially, they should pay the cost not others.Looking from a smokers perspective, the chase points should be taken into consideration. A public ban on smoking is a removal of excerption i n an age that seeks to empower the individual. Smokers are not purposely trying to make non-smokers lives a misery, many smoke outside for the convenience of those who do not want to inhale the smoke fumes. Restaurants, public-transport facilities and shopping centres are predominantly smoke free. There are that a handful of areas in which people are free to smoke, including bars and nightclubs.One may also look at car fumes as being a similar problem to smoking fumes. Cars produce harmful Carbon Monoxide fumes which are consumed by individuals rather than the driver of the car. In the very(prenominal) sense should cars be banned from public places because they also produce harmful fumes? This point can also be said of alcohol and factory fumes, both of these either are harmful to the surroundings or someones health.Bearing in mind that smoking is an addiction, it is important not to isolate smokers. muckle who smoke shouldnt be made to feel like brotherly outcasts, so provisi on should be made to furnish for them. No pocket of decree should be excluded this could be paralleled to the Jews in Germany.In other continents for example Spain, smoking in public places is not frowned upon. There are no restrictions on where you can and cannot smoke. This shows that smoking in public places has already been dealt with in this country to an extent that smokers are seldomley annoying the non-smoking public. Restrictions in the U.K already appear extreme in comparison to other countries and if restrictions conk out any worse, we might be excluding tourists as well up as British smokers to our society.Some people only smoke socially on weekends, it de-stresses people and is a stimulant which encourages conversation (where alcohol is a depressant). If there is a ban on smoking in all public places, pubs and nightclubs would lose most of their profit. People would not want to go out if they were not able to smoke socially.Passive smoking is stupid evidence we ca n not prove that inhaling others smoke is in fact harmful. So passive smoking might not cause all non-smokers health problems.In conclusion I dont think smoking should be banned in all public places, as that would exclude smokers in our society however I do believe more designated smoking areas should be introduced especially in pubs and nightclubs. In todays society were acceptance and compromise are two break principles, exclusion of any sub group would attend to go against the grain of social thinking.